A plan without owners is a list of suggestions, and a policy step without a criterion is a date somebody will meet by changing a record regardless of the evidence.
Owners
| Work | Owner | Not the owner |
|---|---|---|
| Registrar account controls | Whoever administers IT accounts | Security, who cannot change them |
| DNS record changes | The DNS owner | The person who wrote the report |
| Aligning a sending platform | The business owner of that platform | Security, who has no account on it |
| Reading aggregate reports weekly | A named individual in security | A team, which means nobody |
| The registrar recovery track | Legal or procurement, with security supporting | Whoever found the problem |
| Deciding to move policy | Security, on stated criteria | A steering group, which cannot meet weekly |
The last two rows are where plans usually fail. Work assigned to whoever discovered it stalls when that person is busy, and a decision that requires a committee happens at committee cadence rather than at evidence cadence.
Criteria
BEFORE p=quarantine on calderandvoss.com
Every source above 0.5% of volume identified and
attributed to a system
Aligned pass rate above 95% for four consecutive weeks
No unexplained source above 0.5%
Forwarding residual understood and accepted
TTL lowered to 300 at least 48h beforehand
Rollback rehearsed at p=none
BEFORE p=reject
Four weeks at quarantine, no attributable incident
Aligned pass rate above 98%
Every remaining failure explained, not merely small
The events platform exception in place on its
own subdomainWritten in advance, these answer “is it safe to proceed” without a meeting. The numbers are defensible defaults; what matters is that they existed before anybody wanted the answer to be yes.
Every step has a way back
- TTL lowered a full current-TTL period before the change, not at the change.
- Triggers for reverting agreed in advance, including which signals do not justify it.
- Partial revert preferred: one step back, or an exemption at a subdomain.
- The rollback rehearsed once while it did not matter.
Put the criteria in the plan, not in the appendix
They are the part that makes the dates meaningful. A plan showing “quarantine, week 12” is a commitment to a date; one showing “quarantine when these four conditions hold, expected week 12” is a commitment to a method, and it survives the conditions not holding on schedule.